Councillors' anger over plans to replace South West agency
PLANS to set up a new body to replace the South West Regional Development Agency (RDA) have sparked an angry response from Exeter City Council.
In the wake of its decision to abolish RDAs, the Government invited submissions from groups of 'upper tier' — county and unitary — local authorities and business interests to propose new Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs).
-
Devon, Plymouth and Torbay councils have submitted plans to form an LEP covering the area — prompting city leaders to accuse County Hall chiefs of "a blatant snub to Exeter and its future economic prosperity".
With relations between the authorities still strained after the city's unsuccessful bid for unitary status, party leaders on the city council united in condemning the lack of a place on the proposed LEP's board for an Exeter representative.
The city council claimed that it and Exeter Chamber of Commerce had been "frozen out of all discussions about and drafting of this submission, despite sustained requests over the last two months to be involved and despite being responsible for the most dynamic city economy in the area".
Liberal Democrat leader of the council, Cllr Adrian Fullam, said: "This is a deeply unhelpful and totally unnecessary stance from the county council, which flies in the face of their stated intention to rebuild bridges with the city.
"More importantly it fails to recognise Exeter's huge and pivotal role in Devon's economy and the strength and obvious track record of the existing partnership between the City Council and Exeter's business community.
"Excluding Exeter in this way is likely to prejudice the city's future growth prospects."
Councillor Norman Shiel, acting leader of the city council's Conservative group, said: "The county council appears to be treating the major regional city of Exeter with contempt in these proposed arrangements. Devon's main focus has always been on rural Devon and it is simply not good enough for Exeter's economic future to be entrusted to it in this way."
Councillor Dilys Baldwin, acting Labour group leader, added: "All we are asking for is that Exeter's economic importance is properly recognised in these arrangements, which is not much to ask and which is already proposed for similar cities elsewhere in the country.
"Unfortunately the county council now seems driven only by a vindictive wish to punish Exeter for having dared to assert its claim to unitary status."
Councillor Joan Morrish, leader of the city council's Liberal group, said: "If these arrangements are approved it will turn the clock back and exclude Exeter's democratically elected representatives from any real influence on key decisions for Exeter's economic future."
Derek Phillips, chairman of Exeter's Chamber of Commerce, said: "It is very disappointing to note that the new inclusiveness, promised by the county following the reversal of the unitary decision, has failed to be delivered in this crucially important area. This is potentially a big setback for business-led growth in Exeter."
Responding to the claims, Devon County Council leader Councillor John Hart said: "We have done our best to talk with Exeter, but Exeter is not a top tier authority — it is only one of eight district authorities. I don't understand why everyone is suddenly shouting that we haven't consulted — we have consulted."











2 Comments
by Cynic, Exeter
Friday, September 03 2010, 11:40PM
“"Is there anyone representing us at the Civic Centre???"
Terrific sense of humour you have, John!”
by John, Exeter
Friday, September 03 2010, 7:32PM
“I have to laugh at the statements of the self serving bunch of supposed Exeter councillors running our once great city. As the saying goes, "you can't have your cake and eat it". These Exeter councillors wasted £2 million of Exeter tax payers money, on a self serving, illegal campaign and totally at odds with the Devon County Council. They became personally embroiled with the Leader of the County Council, Greenslade and refused to maintain a working relationship wth the DCC because of their intent on gaining unitary status. Now because they failed and were found to be acting illegally and similarly were ill advised, they are all having to be re-elected, this after their self serving farce, they are crying over spilt milk. Anyone with "one ounce" of commonsense would expect the same reaction from the DCC. The Exeter councillors should have thought of their actions and the resultant outcome. Is there anyone representing us at the Civic Centre???”