Why does hunting campaign continue
CHRIS Gale — Bloodsports leaflets will be arriving soon, Points of view, April 10 — has waded into the anti-hunting debate, obviously to bolster the continued campaign against the hunting community.
Such campaigners are becoming increasingly frantic that the ban could be lifted in the future.
I do not participate in hare coursing but surely "a hare being pulled apart by dogs" is as nature intended. Hare, like rabbits have to be culled otherwise we shall be overrun by them.
Ask any Australian how he views dear little bunny rabbits! Lack of natural predators is a problem in this country.
In order to stir the emotions of people who are well-meaning but ignorant of how nature works he gives a vivid and graphic description of a "stag chased to exhaustion by a pack of hounds, its tongue hanging from its mouth as it cowers in terror."
So pity the poor elk then, an animal even more majestic that our native stag when it is attacked and killed by a pack of wolves.
What is the difference except that the latter is open season throughout the year?
So Mr Gale, what are you going to do to try and stop such barbarity?!
M Lewis
Rackenford
Tiverton







6 Comments
by Will, Dorset
Monday, April 20 2009, 10:11PM
“The bunny problem in this country was addressed by labour who released miximatousis into the countryside, which causes blindness and suffering until the rabbit starves or is caught! And they call us hunters cruel!”
by Ian Woolger, Budleigh Salterton
Monday, April 20 2009, 11:21AM
“I am not, "Pro Hunting", I am however "Pro Choice" and it is a sad thing, that the members of both the pro and anti lobby, do themselves no favours, with their stupid comments and arrogant behaviour. I personally, see no need whatsoever for hunting as a "public spectacle sport", however I do see a need for hunting certain animals. Foxes cause massive damage to chickens and will kill many more than they wish to eat. They are vermin and as such, hunting them with dogs is an efficient way of controlling those that cause the most damage. IE the old and weak foxes who seek easy prey IE Chickens. Deer hunting however is a different ball game. Deer are large easy targets which can be culled by rifle, with ease by a marksman. There is no need for a host of hounds to rip a deer apart for the edification of the hunt followers. Also venison is edible, so the meat from shot deer is a useful addition to the food chain. These however are my personal views and I do not seek to impose them on others. Hunting of all sorts will always be an emotive issue, but in reality, what is worse? To hunt an animal, where it has some chance of escape and the fittest will survive, or to breed animals in metal pens, fed on chemicals and additives until they are executed to feed us? I know which of the chances I would rather take.....”
by Giles Bradshaw, Rose Ash
Monday, April 20 2009, 9:10AM
“In actual fact Judi lynx are significant predators of foxes and were common animals here. Check the literature.
As you know I don't kill for fun I choose to control the deer on my land without killing them.
Chris Gale has publically opposed my campaign to remove the requirement to kill the deer I flush out.”
by Judi Hewitt, Denbighshire
Sunday, April 19 2009, 4:42PM
“What an Idiotic response from M Lewis and Giles Bradshaw! Just goes to prove that they don't have an argument to support their views on killing for fun.
For a start foxes were never the natural prey for wolves. Secondly predatory animals kill only because threy have to in order to survive. Moronic so called hunters kill because they find it fun - in other words sadistic and in my view sub-human!
Keep up the great work Chris - there are loads of people who support and admire the work you do.”
by Giles Bradshaw, Rose Ash
Saturday, April 18 2009, 1:18PM
“With the very greatest6 respect Daryl but you do not have a clue what you are talking about.
The people who you refer to are following the hunt and the Hunting Act does not apply to them. It only applies to the people in charge of the dogs.”
by Darryll Scott, Thorverton
Saturday, April 18 2009, 12:30PM
“What total drivel, equating the barbaric (and illegal!) act that is hunting with hounds to what happens in nature is missing one vital point - in nature the animal that is hunted by predators is not followed by & supported/assisted by a group of ignorant blood thirsty aristo's caught up with their own self importance to think that the law does not apply to them - ho would they feel if while out hunting they were burgled because the intruder chose to beleive that he didn't like the law so just ignored it? It makes you think doesn't it!”