THE response by Giles Bradshaw to proposals to strengthen the Hunting Act is a classic example of a hunt supporter's inverted logic.

Giles argues that a reckless behaviour clause added to the Act, and written is such a way as to exempt the everyday dog owner, will result in an onslaught of everyday people taking the opportunity to set their dogs onto our wildlife with impunity.

Giles seems not to realise that it is only a hunt supporter who would think to react in this way and not the majority of responsible, law-abiding dog owners in this country who make every effort to control their dogs with the occasional slip, as opposed to the 'accidentally on purpose' routine of the hunter.

In terms of the Hunting Act, it is very common for legislation to be tightened and any move to grasp this nettle will have widespread popular support, a real bonus in the run up to a general election.

Labour MPs are waking up to this opportunity as we speak so it's only a matter of time.

G E Purser.

Clapton-on-the-Hill,

Cheltenham

(by email)